LOC13:02
10:02 GMT
LONDON, May 18 (KUNA) -- The UK Government Monday lost an appeal to
overturn a court ruling that British soldiers can be covered by human rights
laws while on the battlefield.
It centred on a test case brought by the family of Private Jason Smith, who
died of heatstroke while serving with the Territorial Army in Iraq in 2003.
The ruling means the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) applies to
UK forces abroad - even in battle.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) had said in a statement the Act could not be
guaranteed in certain situations.
"The Ministry of Defence has argued consistently that in the heat of battle
during dynamic and fast moving military operations on foreign territory, the
UK could not secure the rights and freedoms which the ECHR seeks to guarantee,
" a spokesman for the MoD earlier said.
The ruling could lead to more families wishing to sue the MoD for
negligence.
The legal process began with a judicial review requested by Private Smith's
family, following the inquest into his death.
The MoD accepted that the Human Rights Act applied to Private Smith, as he
died on a British military base.
However, in a judgement last April, the judge ruled more widely that the
MoD had an obligation to avoid or minimise risks to the lives of its troops,
wherever they were serving - even while on patrol or in battle.
Otherwise, he said it risked breaching the "right to life" enshrined in the
European Convention on Human Rights.
The MoD appealed amid fears that the judgement raised serious questions
over sending troops into combat abroad, because absolute protection could
never be guaranteed on the battlefield. (end)
he.bz.
KUNA 181302 May 09NNNN